What is FARC?

Don't Panic...your war questions answered
Published 03.19.08
Andisheh Nouaree

FARC is pronounced like FARK, the irreverent news aggregator website I'm hoping will link to this article, driving tens of thousands of readers to this story, thus giving my employers the impression that my writing is more popular than it actually is.

Yet despite the homophony, FARC and FARK are not the same. FARK kills time, brain cells and bandwidth. FARC kills people.

Lots of people.

FARC stands for Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia. In English, that means Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

FARC is an armed rebel group. It is one of several armed groups in the country – leftist rebels, right-wing paramilitaries, the government, drug lords – that have turned Colombia into one of the world's most violent places.

FARC has been at war with Colombia's government, and its people, since 1965. The group was born of Colombia's historic economic disparity.

Like pretty much all of Latin America, Colombia's wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few super-rich. Wealthy Colombians tend to belong to the country's white, European-descended minority, while the poor are typically from Colombia's mixed European, Amerindian or African heritage.

FARC was founded by an alliance of Marxists and peasant militias. Their stated goal – to stick up for the political and economic rights of the rural poor by waging a guerilla and terrorist war against Colombia's government.

At its turn-of-the-century peak, FARC had some 16,000 members. It derives its income, some $200 million to $300 million annually, largely from cocaine trafficking. Just like driving supports oil-rich dictators and terrorists, and buying conflict diamonds bankrolls wars in Africa, doing coke funds violent rebels in Colombia.

It was so strong that, in 1999, Colombia's government ceded control of roughly one-third of Colombia (equal to an area the size of Ohio, only warmer and with better coffee).

The government hoped that giving up the land would foster negotiations that would stop, or at least slow, Colombia's staggering rate of violence. (In 2002, for example, about 32,000 Colombians were murdered – a murder rate 11 times higher than the United States', which if you haven't noticed can be rather murderous at times.)

Needless to say the government's appeasement plan didn't work out. In 2001, FARC kidnapped and assassinated a former Colombian government minister. In 2002, it kidnapped a presidential candidate and hijacked a plane to kidnap a Colombian senator who was on board.

In August 2002, Álvaro Uribe assumed Colombia's presidency, and reversed course with FARC. Instead of talking, he redoubled Colombia's effort to attack it.

With money and weapons supplied by the United States (which pours billions in military aid to Colombia in a futile attempt to stop Colombia's cocaine production), Uribe has hacked away at FARC's strength. It's reportedly only half the military force it was, and recent killings of some of its top leaders have left it flailing.

FARC was mentioned in the American press recently because it was at the center of what seemed an imminent war between Colombia and its neighbor, Venezuela, this month.

After Colombian forces killed a top commander, Raul Reyes in Ecuador, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez went on TV and ordered Venezuela's military to reinforce Venezuela's border with Colombia.

"Minister of defense," he said, "Send me 10 battalions to the border, including tanks."

Why would Venezuela's president care what happens between Colombia and Ecuador?

Some say Chavez is beating his chest to bolster his sagging popularity within Venezuela. Others have suggested that Reyes' computer, recovered by Colombian forces, has revealed that Chavez and Ecuador's leftist president, Rafael Correa, have been strong secret supporters of FARC. Chavez's military move may have been an attempt to preempt a Colombian attack on FARC strongholds in Venezuela.

Emergency peace talks in the Dominican Republic appear to have averted war between the three countries, but the core issue – namely Venezuela's and Ecuador's support for FARC – remains a source of tension.

COMMENTS

RE: What is FARC?

Posted by cip on 03.20.08 @ 05:20 PM

Lulabelle.....so what you are saying is take away the 6 billion per year that the US gives to Colombia including military training, weapons and intelligence to combat internal terrorism not to mention political support and Colombia would be a Tropical Paradise vacationer's dream?

RE: What is FARC?

Posted by KMark on 03.20.08 @ 02:11 PM

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/051104.html

But I'm sure you know, at least when you're off your antipsychotic medications, that all Americans are part of a single hive-mind, so anything any one American does, we all planned and agreed to ahead of time, and we're all out to get everyone else on the planet.

RE: What is FARC?

Posted by lulabelle on 03.19.08 @ 11:34 PM

Even if Chavez has funded FARC I think that corporations like Coca Cola (with their assassinations of unionizers and torture of their families) and Chiquita (with their exploitation of workers as well as their own funding of FARC) have had significant influence over the embattled people of Colombia. Likewise the influence and funding and training of Colombians by the U.S. has provided reason for many Colombians to support FARC. Plan Colombia and the bogus War on Drugs has decimated the possibility of any non-drug economy in Colombia. Fields have been rendered useless for crops of any sort and the agricultural output has declined drastically. FARC has done significant amounts of terroristic action, however; were there not such a corrupt and downright evil opposition to FARC in the Colombian government (which might be considered a pseudo puppet of the US) the fuel and support for FARC would be fringe. FARC is no longer (if ever it was) a Marxist group. They are a group that has exploited the people of Latin American countries whose only other option is the U.S. trained terrorists of their government. FARC may have once seemed like the lesser of evils for Latin Americans who have come to suffer under their perilous reign as well. The people of Colombia have been victims of the Drug War, U.S. corporations, Plan Colombia, etc etc. Support of FARC by Chavez is certainly not good. I would say that in the scale of fucking up Colombia and Latin America in general far worse has been done by the U.S.

YOUR COMMENT

TOOLS

Save this story Email this story to a friend Print this story
SHARE: